Study Reveals Major Shortfalls in Genetic Cancer Risk Testing

A recently published study has uncovered a significant shortfall in the genetic testing of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer—commonly referred to as womb cancer—across the UK and Ireland. Although the presence of Lynch syndrome, a hereditary condition that substantially elevates cancer risks, is a critical factor in patient management, less than half of eligible patients undergoing endometrial cancer treatment receive confirmatory blood testing. This gap in healthcare delivery persists despite clear recommendations from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), highlighting a pressing need to address systemic inefficiencies in genetic screening protocols.

Lynch syndrome, known scientifically as a hereditary mismatch repair deficiency, dramatically increases susceptibility to multiple cancers, most notably those of the uterus and colon. Affecting approximately one in every 300 individuals, it remains underdiagnosed with a staggering 95% of carriers unaware of their genetic status. The syndrome results from inherited variants in a group of genes responsible for correcting DNA replication errors, including MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2. Malfunctions in these genes compromise the DNA repair process, leading to microsatellite instability and increased mutation rates, which then drive carcinogenesis.

In the context of endometrial cancer, the lifetime risk for individuals harboring Lynch syndrome mutations surges to nearly 50%, a stark contrast with the general population risk of around 3%. This heightened risk underscores the paramount importance of early identification and intervention. Genetic testing serves not only to stratify risk but also to facilitate targeted surveillance and preventive measures. For instance, individuals diagnosed with Lynch syndrome can benefit from regular colonoscopic screening to intercept colorectal malignancies at a treatable stage and may consider prophylactic surgeries like hysterectomy to mitigate future risk.

.adsslot_Ca07QSusFn{ width:728px !important; height:90px !important; }
@media (max-width:1199px) { .adsslot_Ca07QSusFn{ width:468px !important; height:60px !important; } }
@media (max-width:767px) { .adsslot_Ca07QSusFn{ width:320px !important; height:50px !important; } }

ADVERTISEMENT

The latest multicenter study, spearheaded by Dr. Neil Ryan from the University of Edinburgh and coordinated under the UK Audit and Research Collaborative in Obstetrics and Gynaecology (UK ARCOG), analyzed data from over 2,500 endometrial cancer cases diagnosed between March 2022 and March 2023. The investigation revealed that while an encouraging 91% of tumors underwent initial mismatch repair (MMR) immunohistochemical testing to detect potential Lynch syndrome markers, the subsequent pathway to definitive genetic confirmation faltered. A breakdown in communication and clinical follow-up resulted in only about two-thirds of eligible patients being referred for genetic counseling and, more critically, less than half completing the essential peripheral blood test required to validate the diagnosis molecularly.

This disconnect in the testing cascade is not purely administrative but impacts clinical outcomes profoundly. Failure to establish a confirmed Lynch syndrome diagnosis leaves patients vulnerability open not only to primary cancer risks but also to the insidious threat of secondary malignancies, especially colorectal cancer. Additionally, the lack of genetic confirmation impedes cascade testing among relatives, who could benefit immensely from preventive surveillance and risk-reducing strategies. Family members may unknowingly inherit the pathogenic variants, thereby enduring invisible, untreated cancer predisposition.

One contributory factor elucidated by the study is the strain on genetic counseling services, where protracted waiting times induce patient attrition. Although NHS Tumor testing effectively identifies possible Lynch syndrome cases, the downstream bottleneck lies in insufficient genetic counseling capacity, delaying definitive testing and intervention. The psychological and logistical challenges posed by these waiting periods contribute to low uptake and completion rates of blood tests and subsequent risk management plans. Thus, the study highlights an urgent imperative to expand genomic medicine infrastructure within oncology services, promoting seamless integration from tumor testing to genetic diagnosis.

From a health economics perspective, efficient identification and management of Lynch syndrome represent cost-saving opportunities for healthcare systems. Early detection enables preemptive measures like the administration of low-dose aspirin, which has been demonstrated to reduce colorectal cancer incidence in Lynch syndrome carriers possibly by modulating inflammatory pathways and DNA damage. Enhanced endoscopic surveillance enables the removal of precancerous lesions, preventing malignant progression. Furthermore, prophylactic gynecological surgeries, while radical, may be considered in appropriate cases to circumvent uterine and ovarian cancers, which pose significant mortality risks when diagnosed at advanced stages.

The biological similarities between Lynch syndrome mutations and other hereditary cancer syndromes, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants in breast and ovarian cancer, underscore the transformative potential of precision oncology. Knowledge of one’s germline DNA repair deficiency permits tailored clinical management and informs therapeutic approaches, such as immunotherapy responsiveness, since tumors exhibiting mismatch repair deficiency often display high mutational burdens conducive to checkpoint inhibitor effectiveness. Hence, correct and timely genetic diagnosis materially influences treatment outcomes beyond prevention.

Despite established NICE guidelines mandating mismatch repair testing of all endometrial and colorectal tumors to identify Lynch syndrome, this study exposes critical gaps in real-world implementation. The findings compel a re-examination of clinical pathways, emphasizing the necessity for enhanced communication protocols within multidisciplinary teams and prioritized access to genetic services. Dr. Ryan stresses that tumor testing alone without structured follow-up to definitive diagnosis is inherently insufficient and leads to missed opportunities in cancer prevention and care optimization.

Moving forward, addressing these deficits involves multidisciplinary coordination, investment in genetic counselor workforce expansion, and perhaps the adoption of streamlined genetic testing technologies such as next-generation sequencing panels directly from tumor biopsies. Incorporating automated alerts and integrated electronic health record notifications could ensure that positive tumor screening results trigger prompt specialist referrals and counseling appointments. Public awareness campaigns may also contribute by educating patients and clinicians on the significance of Lynch syndrome testing to circumvent dropouts and disengagement.

In sum, this pivotal research calls attention to a systemic issue in contemporary oncology practice wherein a substantial proportion of women with endometrial cancer remain under-tested for Lynch syndrome despite comprehensive tumor screening efforts. Accurate and timely genetic diagnosis is indispensable to effectively mitigate future cancer risks for patients and their families. By closing the testing and referral gap, healthcare services stand to improve patient prognoses while reaping the broader societal benefits of hereditary cancer prevention. Lynch syndrome represents a quintessential example of how molecular medicine can redefine cancer care and prognosis through early detection and personalized prevention.

Subject of Research: Mismatch repair testing and Lynch syndrome diagnosis in endometrial cancer across the UK and Ireland

Article Title: Mismatch in testing: a retrospective analysis of mismatch repair testing in endometrial cancer and Lynch syndrome diagnosis in multiple specialist centres in the UK and Ireland (March 2022– March 2023)

Web References: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000688

Keywords: Uterine cancer, Colon cancer, Cancer genetics

Tags: cancer risk managementcancer susceptibility genesendometrial cancer screeninggenetic cancer risk testinggenetic testing protocolsgenetics and cancerhealthcare delivery inefficiencieshereditary cancer syndromesLynch syndrome diagnosismismatch repair deficiencypatient management in oncologyunderdiagnosed genetic conditions