Algeria’s Risk Governance Advances Sendai Framework Goals

In recent years, the global community has intensified its focus on disaster risk reduction, especially in light of the increasing frequency and severity of natural and human-induced hazards. Among the frameworks designed to guide international efforts in this domain, the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction stands as a landmark strategy adopted by United Nations member states in 2015. The framework outlines a comprehensive approach to mitigating disaster risks and enhancing resilience worldwide over the decade from 2015 to 2030. Algeria, a country marked by its diverse topography and exposure to hazards such as earthquakes, floods, and droughts, presents a compelling case study for understanding how risk governance mechanisms can be effectively aligned with the ambitious goals of the Sendai Framework.

Recent research by Benouar and Benmokhtar explores the intricate landscape of risk governance in Algeria with respect to the implementation of the Sendai Framework. Their work delves deep into the structural, institutional, and policy dimensions shaping Algeria’s disaster risk management approach. The authors emphasize that risk governance transcends mere institutional arrangements; it embodies the dynamic interaction of multiple stakeholders, including government entities, civil society, private sector, and international partners, each contributing to a cohesive and resilient disaster management ecosystem. This multifaceted governance structure is critical for harnessing synergies and overcoming silos that traditionally hamper disaster risk reduction efforts.

One of the key technical challenges highlighted in the research revolves around the data infrastructure and risk assessment capabilities of Algeria’s disaster management authorities. Accurate risk mapping, hazard modeling, and vulnerability assessments are foundational for informed decision-making under the Sendai Framework’s implementation guidelines. The study critically assesses the existing gaps in data quality, accessibility, and interoperability. It argues that enhanced investment in geospatial technologies, remote sensing capabilities, and integrated information systems will be pivotal to creating a real-time situational awareness platform indispensable for early warning systems and rapid response interventions.

Institutionally, Algeria’s disaster risk governance is characterized by a complex interplay of national, regional, and local authorities, each with varying degrees of autonomy and resource capacity. The article underscores the importance of decentralization as a strategic enabler, allowing local governments to tailor risk reduction strategies according to their unique hazard profiles and socio-economic contexts. However, decentralization also poses coordination challenges, particularly in establishing standardized protocols and capacities across different administrative levels. Benouar and Benmokhtar advocate for strengthening inter-agency collaboration frameworks, backed by legislative reforms that clarify roles, responsibilities, and accountability mechanisms.

An essential element in the governance paradigm is the integration of disaster risk reduction into broader socio-economic planning processes. The authors dissect Algeria’s current development planning models to identify opportunities where risk considerations are systematically embedded, especially in infrastructure development, urban planning, and environmental management sectors. They illustrate how disaster risks, if left unaccounted for, can undermine developmental gains and exacerbate vulnerabilities, particularly among marginalized populations. The research calls for a paradigm shift towards a risk-informed development agenda that harnesses innovative tools such as risk-based budgeting, climate adaptation finance, and inclusive policy dialogues.

Community engagement emerges as another critical pillar in the Sendai-aligned risk governance model explicated in the study. Algeria’s diverse demographic landscape—with its mix of urban, rural, and nomadic populations—necessitates culturally sensitive and participatory approaches to risk communication and capacity building. The research describes pilot programs where community-led hazard identification and response training were conducted, resulting in improved local ownership and resilience outcomes. Such initiatives exemplify the transformative potential of bottom-up knowledge integration, which complements top-down governance structures by fostering trust and adaptive capacities at the grassroots level.

Technological innovations also feature prominently in the article’s discussion on disaster risk reduction implementation. The authors explore the potential of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and big data analytics in revolutionizing early warning systems and post-disaster recovery operations. For Algeria, leveraging such cutting-edge tools offers an unprecedented opportunity to enhance predictive accuracy, optimize resource allocation, and accelerate decision-making cycles. Nevertheless, the research cautions that technological adoption must be accompanied by robust governance frameworks ensuring ethical considerations, data privacy, and equitable access across all societal strata.

Financial mechanisms for disaster risk governance constitute another domain scrutinized by Benouar and Benmokhtar. The research reveals that while Algeria has made progress in mobilizing domestic resources for disaster management, significant funding gaps remain, especially for proactive risk reduction investments. The authors advocate for exploring innovative finance instruments, such as catastrophe bonds, risk pooling arrangements, and public-private partnerships, which have been successfully piloted in other contexts. Strengthening financial resilience through diversified and sustainable mechanisms, they argue, is indispensable for maintaining continuous and effective implementation of the Sendai Framework commitments.

Legal and regulatory frameworks form the backbone of effective disaster risk governance. The article provides a comprehensive overview of Algeria’s legislative landscape related to disaster risk reduction and identifies areas ripe for reforms. In particular, the authors stress the need to align national laws with international obligations under the Sendai Framework, thereby ensuring coherence and institutional legitimacy. Strengthened enforcement mechanisms, clear sanctioning protocols, and inclusive stakeholder consultations are proposed as essential components of a resilient legal architecture.

Climate change adaptation emerges as an intersecting concern within the disaster risk governance discourse. Algeria’s vulnerability to climate variability—manifesting through prolonged droughts and erratic precipitation—compounds the complexity of disaster risk profiles. The article discusses integrated approaches that harmonize disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation strategies, thereby creating co-benefits and avoiding policy redundancies. This holistic governance approach facilitates long-term sustainability and resilience, aligning with global imperatives for transformative change in environmental stewardship.

The study also sheds light on international cooperation dynamics shaping Algeria’s risk governance. Given that disaster risks and climate impacts are transboundary phenomena, collaborative frameworks involving regional partners, multilateral organizations, and donor agencies play a catalytic role. The research highlights Algeria’s engagement in knowledge exchange platforms, joint exercises, and capacity-building initiatives, which contribute to strengthening its institutional preparedness and response capabilities. Such cooperative mechanisms are instrumental in fostering comprehensive risk management paradigms that transcend national boundaries.

In the context of urbanization trends, Algeria faces mounting disaster risks in its rapidly growing cities. The article analyzes urban risk governance challenges, including informal settlements, infrastructure deficits, and multi-hazard exposures. The authors argue for integrating disaster risk reduction into urban policy frameworks and spatial planning processes, emphasizing the role of resilient infrastructure, sustainable land use, and effective service delivery systems. Enhancing urban governance capacities is critical to safeguarding lives and livelihoods in Algeria’s burgeoning metropolitan areas.

The role of education and capacity building receives focused attention, recognizing that knowledge dissemination and skill enhancement are foundational to effective disaster risk governance. Algeria’s educational institutions, professional training centers, and community outreach programs collectively contribute to building a culture of safety and resilience. The authors argue for expanding interdisciplinary curricula that integrate hazard science, governance principles, and social vulnerabilities, enabling the next generation of practitioners and policymakers to navigate complex risk landscapes adeptly.

Throughout the detailed analysis, the article underscores monitoring and evaluation (M&E) as essential components ensuring accountability and continuous improvement in Sendai Framework implementation. Effective M&E systems enable the tracking of progress, identification of bottlenecks, and adaptive management of disaster risk governance strategies. In Algeria’s case, the research recommends developing standardized performance indicators, enhancing reporting mechanisms, and facilitating participatory evaluation processes that engage diverse stakeholders.

Benouar and Benmokhtar’s research ultimately presents a nuanced and technically rich exploration of Algeria’s journey toward embedding the Sendai Framework’s principles into its disaster risk governance architecture. The study’s comprehensive insights offer valuable guidance for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers alike, emphasizing the need for integrated, inclusive, and technology-enabled governance approaches. With disaster risks escalating globally, Algeria’s experience serves as a vital reference point for countries navigating similar challenges in the pursuit of resilient and sustainable development.

—

Subject of Research: Disaster risk governance and implementation of the Sendai Framework in Algeria.

Article Title: Risk Governance for the Implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction in Algeria.

Article References:

Benouar, D., Benmokhtar, A. Risk Governance for the Implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction in Algeria.
Int J Disaster Risk Sci 16, 58–70 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-025-00619-4

Image Credits: AI Generated

Tags: Algeria disaster risk governanceAlgeria’s disaster management ecosystemcomprehensive disaster risk reduction strategiesearthquake and flood risk in Algeriahuman-induced hazards and governanceinstitutional frameworks for risk reductioninternational cooperation in disaster risk governancenatural hazard management in Algeriapolicy development for disaster resilienceresilience building in disaster-prone regionsSendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reductionstakeholder collaboration in disaster management