New data show pembrolizumab improves breast cancer outcomes regardless of age or menopausal status
Milan, Italy: New data from the KEYNOTE-756 phase 3 clinical trial show that adding the immunotherapy drug, pembrolizumab, to chemotherapy before and after surgery for breast cancer leads to better outcomes for patients regardless of their age or menopausal status. Credit: Prof. Javier Cortes Milan, Italy: New data from the KEYNOTE-756 phase 3 clinical trial […]
Milan, Italy: New data from the KEYNOTE-756 phase 3 clinical trial show that adding the immunotherapy drug, pembrolizumab, to chemotherapy before and after surgery for breast cancer leads to better outcomes for patients regardless of their age or menopausal status.
Credit: Prof. Javier Cortes
Milan, Italy: New data from the KEYNOTE-756 phase 3 clinical trial show that adding the immunotherapy drug, pembrolizumab, to chemotherapy before and after surgery for breast cancer leads to better outcomes for patients regardless of their age or menopausal status.
The findings, presented at the 14th European Breast Cancer Conference (EBCC 14) today (Wednesday), add to information available on the effect of pembrolizumab in patients with early-stage breast cancer that is at high risk of recurring or spreading further, and that is oestrogen receptor positive (ER positive) and HER2 negative [1].
KEYNOTE-756 is an international trial, which has been running for eight years. It randomised 1278 patients to receive pembrolizumab or placebo in addition to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (given before surgery) followed by adjuvant (given after surgery) pembrolizumab or placebo in combination with an endocrine therapy. The patients had invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), meaning the cancer had started to spread out of the milk ducts into the surrounding breast tissues.
Professor Javier Cortés, Director of the International Breast Cancer Centre in Barcelona, Spain, said: “We have already reported that there was a statistically significant increase in the pathological complete response rate in patients receiving pembrolizumab compared to those receiving the placebo. The pathological complete response rate, meaning that no cancer cells remained in the breast or lymph nodes, was 24.3% in patients treated with pembrolizumab compared to 15.6% in patients treated with the placebo.
“Now we can show that these pCR rates occurred regardless of the patients’ age or menopausal status. In patients younger than 50 years old, the pCR rate was 23.8% in those on pembrolizumab (76 out of 319 patients) compared to 16.9% (55 out of 326) for those receiving placebo, and was 24.7% (78 of 316 patients) versus 14.2% (45 of 317) respectively in those aged 50 or older. In pre-menopausal women, the pCR rate was 23.4% (83 out of 354 patients) versus 16.1% (57 out of 353) respectively, and in post-menopausal women, it was 24.8% (69 out of 278 patients) versus 14.6% (42 out of 287), respectively.
“We also found that adding pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not delay the time to surgery. The average time to surgery in both groups of patients was about a month. The average time after surgery to the start of adjuvant treatment was 1.2 months in both groups.”
The study found there were similar rates of breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy in both groups. Among the patients who had breast-conserving surgery, 41.3% (262 patients) received pembrolizumab and 43.7% (281 patients) received placebo. Among those who had a mastectomy, 55.3% (351 patients) were treated with pembrolizumab and 54.4% (350 patients) had the placebo.”
Tissue collected at the time of surgery was analysed to see if any cancer cells remained after the neoadjuvant treatment, known as residual cancer burden (RCB). Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab resulted in a lower RCB for more patients, regardless of how well the immunotherapy had blocked a protein called PD-L1, which also drives some breast cancers.
Pathology reports found that 35% of patients (222 patients) treated with pembrolizumab had no or very small amounts of cancer cells remaining (RCB 0-1) versus 23.6% of patients (152) receiving placebo. A moderate amount of RCB (RCB-2) was found in 40.8% of patients treated with pembrolizumab versus 45.3% (259 versus 291 patients), and extensive RCB (RCB-3) was found in 20.5% versus 28.9% of patients respectively (130 versus 186 patients).
When the researchers looked at the effect of pembrolizumab according to whether patients had cancer that was ER positive in less than 10% of cells or in 10% or more, they found that 64.7% of patients (22 out of 34) with less than 10%, who were treated with pembrolizumab, had an RCB status of 0-1, compared to 37.2% of patients treated with placebo (16 out of 43). In patients with 10% or more ER positive cells, 33.3% compared to 22.7% had an RCB 0-1 status (200 out of 601 patients versus 136 out of 600 patients respectively).
Dr Fatima Cardoso, Director of the Breast Unit of the Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Lisbon, Portugal, is the principal investigator for the trial. Speaking before EBCC 14, she said: “Keynote 756 trial showed that the addition of pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly increased pathological response at the time of surgery, and this was true regardless of PD-L1 levels and oestrogen receptor positivity. However, we saw a bigger benefit with higher PD-L1 levels and in ER-low tumours.
“Keynote-756 is also the only trial that is powered to analyse the impact of immunotherapy in long-term outcomes for this subtype of breast cancer.”
Adverse events from the treatments were unchanged from previous reports from the trial and were consistent with what is known already about each regimen.
The trial continues to follow the patients, and information is being collected on survival rates and whether there are any recurrences of cancer or other related symptoms.
Professor Michail Ignatiadis from the Institut Jules Bordet in Brussels, Belgium, is Chair of the 14th European Breast Cancer Conference and was not involved in the research. He said: “We have heard more data from the KEYNOTE-756 trial about which ER positive / HER2 negative patient subgroups benefit most from pembrolizumab in terms of pathological complete response. Longer follow-up is needed in order to see whether the improvement in pCR rates will result in more patients living for longer without their disease recurring, and we look forward to these data in due course.”
(ends)
Abstract no: 4, “Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo + chemotherapy, followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo plus endocrine therapy for early-stage high-risk ER+/HER2− breast cancer: Results from the phase 3 KEYNOTE-756 study”, Wednesday 20 March, Young Investigator Innovation Award and oral abstract session, 11:00-12:55 hrs CET, Silver room. https://cm.eortc.org/cmPortal/Searchable/ebcc14/config/Normal/#!sessiondetails/0000107210_0
[1] ER positive cancers have receptors on the cell surfaces for the hormone oestrogen that encourage breast cancer cells to grow. HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) negative means the cancer cells do have high levels of HER2 receptors on their surfaces.
Method of Research
Randomized controlled/clinical trial
Subject of Research
People
Article Title
Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo + chemotherapy, followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo plus endocrine therapy for early-stage high-risk ER+/HER2− breast cancer: Results from the phase 3 KEYNOTE-756 study
Article Publication Date
20-Mar-2024
COI Statement
Fatima Cardoso: Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Amgen, Astellas/Medivation, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, GE Oncology, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Iqvia, Macrogenics, Medscape, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, Merus BV, Mylan, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre-Fabre, prIME Oncology, Roche, Sanofi, Samsung, Bioepis, Seagen, Teva, and Touchime. Support for attending meetings and/or travel from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Roche, Gilead, and Seagen
Joyce O’ Shaughnessy: consultant: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo Company, Eisai, Eli Lilly and Company, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, G1 Therapeutics, Genentech, Genomic Health, Heron Therapeutics, Inc., Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc., Seattle Genetics.
Heather McArthur reports receiving consultancy fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calithera, Celgene, Crown Bioscience, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, Immunomedics, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, OBI Pharma, Peregrine, Pfizer, Puma, Seattle Genetics, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, and TapImmune and research support from Bristol Myers Squibb, BTG, MedImmune LLC/AstraZeneca, and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
Peter Schmid: grant/contract: Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech, Medivation Inc., Novartis, OncoGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. consultant: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eisai, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Puma Biotechnology data and safety monitoring: Novartis
Javier Cortes: Consulting Fees (eg, advisory boards) Author Roche, Celgene, Cellestia, AstraZeneca, Seattle Genetics, Daiichi Sankyo, Erytech, Athenex, Polyphor, Lilly, MSD, GSK, Leuko, Bioasis, Clovis Oncology, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ellipses, Hibercell, BioInvent, Gemoab, Gilead. Fees for Non-CME Services Received Directly from Commercial Interest or their Agents (eg, speakers’ bureaus) Author Roche, Novartis, Celgene, Eisai, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Lilly, MSD, Daiichi Sankyo. Contracted Research Author Roche, Ariad Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Baxalta GMBH/Servier Affaires, Bayer Healthcare, Eisai, F. Hoffman-La Roche, Guardant Health, MSD, Pfizer, Piqur Therapeutics, Puma C, Queen Mary University of London. Ownership Interest (stock, stock options, or other ownership interest excluding diversified mutual funds) Author MedSIR. Other Author Travel, accommodation: Roche, Novartis, Eisai, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo.
Nadia Harbeck: consultant: AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, Novartis, Pfizer Pharma GmbH, Pierre Fabre Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sandoz, Seagen Inc., West German Study Group other business ownership: West German Study Group other: Amgen, Exact Sciences, Lilly Deutschland, Pierre Fabre Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Melinda L Telli: Nothing to disclose.
David W. Cescon: Consultancy/Advisory: AstraZeneca, Exact Sciences, Eisai, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Inflex, Inivata/Neogenomics, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and SAGA research support to their institution from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Inivata, Knight, MSD, Pfizer, and Roche is a member of a trial steering committee for AstraZeneca, MSD, and GlaxoSmithKline and holds a patent (US62/675,228) for methods of treating cancers characterized by a high expression level of spindle and kinetochore associated complex subunit 3 (ska3) gene.
Peter A. Fasching: Daiichi-Sankyo consultant: Agendia, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Clin-Sol Research Gmbh, Gilead Sciences, Lilly Deutschland, Macrogenics, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Myelo Therapeutics, Pfizer Deutschland, Roche, Seagen Inc. grant/contract: Biontech, Cepheid
Zhimin Shao: Nothing to disclose.
Delphine Loirat: Nothing to disclose.
Yeon Hee Park: Consultancy or advisory fees: AstraZeneca, Eisai, Eli Lilly Export S.A. Puerto Rico Branch, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. Research funding: AstraZeneca, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche.
Manuel Gonzalez Fernandez: Nothing to disclose.
Gábor Rubovszky: Honoraria from MSD, Roche, Novartis, Lilly, Swixx and Pfizer.
Seock-Ah Im: Consulting/Advisory role: AstraZeneca, Novartis, Roche/Genentech, Pfizer, Amgen, Hanmi, Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp and Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, Daiichi Sankyo, Idience Co. Ltd, and Bertis Research funding to institution: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Daewoong Pharmaceutical, Eisai Korea, and Boryung Pharm.
Rina Hui: consultant: AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck KGaA, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, Novartis, OncoSec Medical Incorporated, Pfizer Australia, Roche Products Pty Ltd, Seagen Inc.
Toshimi Takano: Lecture fees from Daiichi-Sankyo, Chugai, Kyowa Kirin, Eisai, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, and Celltrion. Research funding from Daiichi-Sankyo, Chugai, Eisai, Ono, and MSD.
Fabrice André: Research grants to institution: AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche.
Hiroyuki Yasojima: Nothing to disclose
Zhenzhen Liu: Nothing to disclose.
Yu Ding, Liyi Jia, Vassiliki Karantza, and Konstantinos Tryfonidis: employees of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, and stockholders in Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
Aditya Bardia: Consultant/Advisory board: Pfizer, Novartis, Genentech, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, Radius Health, Immunomedics/Gilead, Sanofi, Daiichi Pharma/Astra Zeneca, Phillips, Eli Lilly, and Foundation Medicine. Contracted Research/Grant (to institution): Genentech, Novartis, Pfizer, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, Sanofi, Radius Health, Immunomedics/Gilead, Daiichi Pharma/Astra Zeneca, and Eli Lilly.
What's Your Reaction?