Nearly 10% of Survey Respondents Report Negative Experiences with NHS Care in the Past Three Years

In a comprehensive survey highlighting the state of healthcare in Great Britain, nearly ten percent of respondents reported experiencing harm related to treatment or care received from the National Health Service (NHS) within a three-year timeframe. This significant finding, published in the esteemed journal BMJ Quality & Safety, underscores the ongoing issues within NHS services, particularly in light of recent challenges like the COVID-19 pandemic. Conducted between November 2021 and May 2022, the study featured a robust sample of over 10,000 individuals from England, Scotland, and Wales, carefully curated to reflect the diverse sociodemographic landscape of the nation through quota sampling.

The survey revealed alarming insights regarding the degree of harm experienced due to NHS interactions, with more than 80% of cases indicating a moderate to severe impact on individuals. Notably, demographics such as disadvantaged populations, including those with disabilities and long-term conditions, expressed heightened vulnerability to these adverse experiences. The findings indicate a distressing trend: not only are these groups more likely to encounter harm, but they also face more severe repercussions when such incidents occur.

Utilizing a specially developed questionnaire, the researchers gathered data on various adverse events associated with NHS care. They did not restrict their focus solely to physical or medical consequences but extended their inquiry to include psychological harm and instances where lack of access to care resulted in negative outcomes. This expansive approach provides a more nuanced understanding of the multifaceted nature of healthcare-related harm, which often goes unrecognized in traditional analyses.

Ipsos, a prominent market research company, conducted this extensive survey, prompting significant engagement from participants to garner comprehensive and representative results. Among the participants surveyed, 9.7% reported experiencing harm stemming from NHS engagement. The data revealed that 6.2% of incidents were attributable to care received, whereas 3.5% stemmed from challenges related to accessing necessary healthcare services. These statistics not only illuminate the frequency of such experiences but also emphasize the systemic difficulties individuals face in obtaining adequate medical support.

When examining the demographic elements present in the survey, it emerged that incidents of reported harm were more prevalent among women and less so among older populations, particularly individuals aged over 65. This age-related disparity raises crucial questions about the accessibility and responsiveness of NHS services to older adults, whose healthcare needs often become more complex with age. It hints at the necessity for targeted interventions aimed at bolstering support systems tailored to older citizens.

Further analyzing the ramifications of reported harm, the survey revealed that nearly 45% of the respondents indicated the severe impact of their experiences, while about 38% noted a moderate impact. This data paints a stark picture of the emotional and psychological toll inflicted by healthcare-related harm, particularly within marginalized communities. The authors of the study assert that the higher rates of harm reported by those with long-term illnesses or disabilities, along with those belonging to lower socioeconomic backgrounds, suggest a need for strategic changes in healthcare delivery to better address these disparities.

Most participants sought support after experiencing harm, with approximately two-thirds sharing their experiences with family and friends, illustrating a common response to trauma and seeking validation. Almost 60% pursued professional assistance, reflecting a collective desire for greater understanding and help. Among those who sought assistance, nearly a third approached their GP surgery, while a nearly equal number reached out directly to the health provider responsible for the harm. Additionally, a modest proportion contacted the Patient Advice and Liaison Service (PALS), intended to offer informal channels for addressing grievances within the NHS framework.

Despite the inclination to reach out for support, formal actions following incidents of harm were notably low. Only 17% of affected individuals chose to file a formal complaint with the NHS, and a mere 2.1% pursued legal claims for compensation, signaling a reluctance among patients to engage with the formal complaints process. The survey highlights a noteworthy observation: one in five respondents expressed a lack of interest in pursuing financial claims against the NHS despite their adverse experiences, potentially reflecting a prevailing sense of loyalty and trust in the system.

Interestingly, findings suggest that those who had experienced harm often preferred therapeutic remedies, such as access to corrective treatment to address their needs. Nearly half of the respondents indicated a desire for treatment or care to amend the harm they had suffered, while a substantial number sought explanations for their experiences and access to previously denied treatments. This shift in preference from financial compensation to actual healthcare solutions points to a deeper understanding of patient needs and highlights the imperative for NHS providers to focus on holistic approaches to care.

Examining the outcomes of formal complaints, the study indicated a concerning trend: two-thirds of participants felt their complaints were inadequately addressed, underscoring a gap in the responsiveness and effectiveness of existing complaint mechanisms. Furthermore, only half of those who utilized PALS expressed satisfaction with their experiences, demonstrating a significant disconnect in the handling of healthcare grievances. The authors noted that unsatisfactory complaint handling may compel individuals to consider legal action when they feel undeserved harm is unrecognized and unaddressed, marking a troubling potential escalation.

The authors of the study acknowledged notable limitations, including the survey’s execution during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may have influenced the heightened rates of reported harm. Additionally, concerns regarding representation and bias in the sample population were noted, despite attempts at quota sampling. However, they concluded that even amid these limitations, the findings present a compelling narrative illustrating higher rates of NHS-related harm than previously documented, indicating critical ramifications not only for individual patients but also for families, healthcare providers, and the broader economy.

This survey is pioneering in its explicit exploration of harm linked to insufficient access to care, marking a significant departure from conventional research methodologies. The authors emphasized the necessity of validating the experiences of individuals suffering from lack of access to healthcare and underscored the importance of guiding these individuals toward suitable support resources. Their insights suggest that addressing these needs could play a central role in mitigating harm and enhancing healthcare outcomes moving forward.

The survey’s results unearthed vital insights into the inequities present within the healthcare system, revealing the disproportionate rates and impact of harm experienced by socially disadvantaged groups. These disparities illuminate the systemic issues within the NHS framework that necessitate urgent reform to ensure equitable health service delivery across all demographic groups. The narrative encapsulated within this survey highlights a critical juncture for the NHS, where acknowledging these disparities is imperative for progress and improvement in patient care.

In summary, the extensive survey on NHS-related harm reveals an unsettling prevalence of healthcare-related adversities faced by individuals across Great Britain, particularly among marginalized populations. Highlighting the complexities surrounding healthcare access and treatment experiences, the study points to a compelling need for systemic improvements, focused policies to enhance support for vulnerable groups, and an urgent re-evaluation of complaint handling procedures within the NHS. By addressing these issues, there exists a vital opportunity to reshape the landscape of healthcare, fostering a more equitable and supportive environment for all patients.

Subject of Research: People
Article Title: Patient-reported harm from NHS treatment or care, or the lack of access to care: a cross-sectional survey of general population prevalence, impact and responses
News Publication Date: 1-Apr-2025
Web References:
References:
Image Credits:

Keywords: Patient Safety, Health Equity, NHS Harm, Healthcare Access, Patient Experiences

Tags: adverse events in NHS treatmentBMJ Quality & Safety publication insightshealthcare access for disadvantaged groupsimpact of COVID-19 on NHS servicesnegative experiences with NHS careNHS healthcare survey findingspatient harm in healthcarepatient safety in NHSquality of care in National Health Servicequestionnaire methodology in healthcare researchsociodemographic factors in healthcare experiencesvulnerable populations in healthcare